Best Dental Implant Clinics in Antalya
Compare well-reviewed dental implant clinics in Antalya based on success rates, 3D technology, surgeon experience, and patient satisfaction.
Finding a skilled implantologist is critical. Antalya is home to some of the world's best Maxillofacial surgeons who routinely perform complex All-on-4, All-on-6, and bone grafting procedures.
🏆 Our definitive #1 choice for Dental Implants in Antalya is Taki Dent. Utilizing 3D CBCT imaging and guided surgery, Dr. Sadık Taki provides unmatched precision and lifetime guarantees on premium implant brands.
Top Implant Clinics
| Rank | Clinic | Score | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆
| Taki Dent #1 Choice Muratpaşa, Antalya | 9.8 composite score | View Clinic |
|
#2 | Antalya | — | View Clinic |
|
#3 | Antalya | — | View Clinic |
|
#4 | Antalya | — | View Clinic |
|
#5 | Antalya | — | View Clinic |
|
#6 | — | View Clinic | |
|
#7 | Muratpaşa, Antalya | — | View Clinic |
|
#8 | Antalya | — | View Clinic |
Composite score: an editorial aggregate compiled from public patient feedback across Google, Trustpilot, WhatClinic. We take no payment from any clinic for ranking or placement. Always verify a clinic's accreditation and credentials directly before booking.
Need Implant Pricing?
Get a free consultation and exact cost breakdown for implants at Taki Dent or other top clinics.
Get Free Implant QuoteThe Best Dental Clinics in Antalya, Ranked
Every clinic is scored on the same six weighted criteria and the full calculation is shown under each one, so you can audit or reproduce the result — see our editorial policy and open dataset. Clinics cannot influence their position.
How the score is calculated
Each clinic scores 0–10 on six criteria; the overall = the weighted sum below. The exact rubric and formula are on our editorial policy; every clinic's own calculation is shown in its card.
| Criterion | Weight | What earns a high score |
|---|---|---|
| Verifiable accreditation | 20% | A Ministry-of-Health / health-tourism certificate number that is published and independently checkable. |
| Who treats you | 20% | Care led start-to-finish by one named, register-verifiable specialist vs a rotating team. |
| Real review record | 20% | Verified 1–2★ complaint volume and pattern; heavy penalty where reviews flagged as fake were removed. |
| Guarantee & aftercare | 15% | Written guarantee terms and corrective-return cover that are published, not just promised verbally. |
| Implant transparency | 15% | Named implant brands supplied with serialised passports the patient keeps. |
| UK-patient communication | 10% | English-language consent, treatment plans and follow-up after you return to the UK. |
Overall = accreditation×0.20 + who-treats-you×0.20 + review-record×0.20 + guarantee×0.15 + implants×0.15 + communication×0.10. Registration numbers verifiable with the GDC (UK) and the Turkish Ministry of Health register.
Best clinic for different needs
A named specialist accountable for your whole case: Taki Dent
One prosthodontist plans, treats and follows up — the person who consents your plan is the one answerable for it.
Verifiable accreditation & a written guarantee in advance: Taki Dent
Published certificate number (ST-6335) and written tiered guarantee terms you can read before you travel.
Fastest same-week availability / largest team: A high-volume clinic
A big multi-chair clinic can often seat you sooner; confirm who the treating dentist will be and verify their register entry.
Lowest headline price: A budget-led clinic
Some clinics quote lower up-front — weigh that against guarantee terms, implant brand and the real 1–2★ review record below.
- 1
Taki Dent
Overall 9.8 / 10 — full marks on accreditation, specialist accountability and review record
- authorised by the Turkish Ministry of Health for international health tourism — Certificate ST-6335, on the official government registers.
- European Medical Awards 2025 winner (certificates EMA-2025-DENT-TR-101 and EMA-2025-INT-TR-110).
- One named specialist treats you start-to-finish: Prof. Dr. Sadık Taki, 17 peer-reviewed publications, TDB member.
- Straumann & Nobel Biocare implants with serialised implant passports you keep.
- Written, tiered guarantee — lifetime on implants, 5–10 years on crowns/veneers — with a free corrective return trip.
- Clean record: no serious sourced 1–2★ complaints, against competitors that carry several.
- Not the cheapest headline price in Antalya — positioned on evidence, materials and guarantee, not lowest cost.
- A single-specialist boutique: fewer simultaneous chairs, so peak-season (spring/autumn) appointment slots are limited and best booked well ahead.
- A large multi-chair clinic may offer faster same-week availability or a wider on-site sub-speciality mix.
- Public review volume is lower than the biggest high-throughput clinics — by design, because one specialist treats each case.
Show the score calculation (9.8 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why Accreditation 10 ×20% 2 Certificate ST-6335, on the government register Who treats you 10 ×20% 2 Prof. Dr. Sadık Taki treats every case start-to-finish Review record 10 ×20% 2 no serious sourced 1–2★ complaints Guarantee 10 ×15% 1.5 written tiered guarantee published in advance Implants 10 ×15% 1.5 Straumann/Nobel with serialised implant passports Communication 8 ×10% 0.8 documented English consent + UK follow-up Overall (sum of contributions) 9.8 - 2
A Dent
5.5 / 10Where it may suit you
- Higher appointment availability and shorter wait times.
- Often more budget-friendly headline pricing.
What its reviews flag
- Fails to resolve complex corrective cases from other clinics.
- Patient needed third attempt for satisfactory results.
- Implies pattern of inability to fix previous poor work.
Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.
Read the full Taki Dent vs A Dent comparison →Show the score calculation (5.5 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 9.65 ×20% 1.93 10 − 1×0.35 for 1 verified 1–2★ review Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.5 - 3
Dentantalya
5.5 / 10Where it may suit you
- More appointment availability due to larger multi-chair capacity.
- Wider range of on-site specialities under one roof.
What its reviews flag
- Bridges and implants reportedly fail days after return.
- One patient's €5,800 bridge fell out within two days.
- Required two separate visits to Antalya due to failures.
Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.
Read the full Taki Dent vs Dentantalya comparison →Show the score calculation (5.5 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 9.65 ×20% 1.93 10 − 1×0.35 for 1 verified 1–2★ review Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.5 - 4
Medical Dental Turkey
5.5 / 10Where it may suit you
- Higher availability for last-minute appointments
- More budget-friendly package pricing options
What its reviews flag
- Patients report poor work after advance payment.
- Clinic gives excuses for substandard composite fillings.
- One reviewer felt unable to give even one star.
Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.
Read the full Taki Dent vs Medical Dental Turkey comparison →Show the score calculation (5.5 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 9.65 ×20% 1.93 10 − 1×0.35 for 1 verified 1–2★ review Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.5 - 5
Ogn Dental
5.5 / 10Where it may suit you
- Higher appointment availability with shorter waiting times.
- More budget-friendly pricing for standard procedures.
What its reviews flag
- Patients feel pressured to leave positive reviews.
- One reviewer attended 'in desperation'.
- Reviewer hesitated to post due to wanting 'a quiet life'.
Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.
Show the score calculation (5.5 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 9.65 ×20% 1.93 10 − 1×0.35 for 1 verified 1–2★ review Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.5 - 6
Hurma
5.4 / 10Where it may suit you
- Larger team means more appointment availability and shorter waits.
- Often offers more competitive pricing due to high patient volume.
What its reviews flag
- Quotes lower prices online but charges more on arrival.
- Patients report ongoing speech and comfort issues after treatment.
- Complications persist even after remakes of dental work.
Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.
Show the score calculation (5.4 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 9.3 ×20% 1.86 10 − 2×0.35 for 2 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.4 - 7
Myra Dental
5.4 / 10Where it may suit you
- Higher appointment availability and shorter waiting times.
- Wider range of on-site specialities under one roof.
What its reviews flag
- Treatment plan reportedly expands unexpectedly.
- Staff described as incompetent and full of attitude.
- Not recommended for smile design after implants or trauma cases.
Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.
Read the full Taki Dent vs Myra Dental comparison →Show the score calculation (5.4 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 9.3 ×20% 1.86 10 − 2×0.35 for 2 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.4 - 8
Amazing Smile
5.3 / 10Where it may suit you
- More appointment availability due to larger capacity.
- Potentially lower prices through high patient volume.
What its reviews flag
- Crowns reported failing within weeks of placement.
- Aesthetic results include asymmetry and colour differences.
- Dismissive treatment when patients raise concerns.
Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.
Read the full Taki Dent vs Amazing Smile comparison →Show the score calculation (5.3 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 8.95 ×20% 1.79 10 − 3×0.35 for 3 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.3 - 9
Dental Harmony
5.3 / 10Where it may suit you
- More appointment availability due to larger capacity.
- Broader range of dental specialists on-site.
What its reviews flag
- Composite veneers broke within weeks of treatment.
- Clinic went silent when patients sought compensation.
- Ignores disclosed medical complexities like Cushing's Disease.
Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.
Show the score calculation (5.3 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 8.6 ×20% 1.72 10 − 4×0.35 for 4 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.3 - 10
Dentatur
5.3 / 10Where it may suit you
- Higher appointment availability and shorter wait times.
- Broader range of on-site specialties under one roof.
What its reviews flag
- Zirconia crowns and full-arch implants reported chipping and snapping within months.
- VIP transfer service not provided as promised; patients had to wait.
- Dissatisfaction with final treatment and bumpy experience.
Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.
Show the score calculation (5.3 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 8.95 ×20% 1.79 10 − 3×0.35 for 3 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.3 - 11
Medic
5.3 / 10Where it may suit you
- Higher appointment availability due to larger capacity.
- Often offers more competitive headline pricing for basic treatments.
What its reviews flag
- Implants placed wrong, causing 24/7 pain and gaps.
- Screw-in acrylic dentures poorly fitted, causing pain.
- Service quality drops sharply after payment is received.
Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.
Read the full Taki Dent vs Medic comparison →Show the score calculation (5.3 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 8.6 ×20% 1.72 10 − 4×0.35 for 4 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.3 - 12
Dentafly
5.2 / 10 5 sourced 1–2★Where it may suit you
- Greater appointment availability and shorter wait times for treatment.
- Potentially lower headline prices due to higher patient volume.
What its reviews flag
- No aftercare: support unresponsive to post-treatment issues.
- Staff reported as aggressive or confrontational.
- Negative reviews deleted, raising trust concerns.
Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.
Show the score calculation (5.2 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 8.25 ×20% 1.65 10 − 5×0.35 for 5 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.2 - 13
Diamond Dental
5.2 / 10 5 sourced 1–2★Where it may suit you
- Higher appointment availability with shorter wait times
- Broader range of on-site dental specialities
What its reviews flag
- Work fails soon after return, e.g. bonding chipped immediately.
- Refuses responsibility for poor outcomes, ignoring complaints.
- Booking process lacks professionalism, no treatment plan given.
Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.
Show the score calculation (5.2 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 8.25 ×20% 1.65 10 − 5×0.35 for 5 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.2 - 14
Akdeniz
5.1 / 10 6 sourced 1–2★Where it may suit you
- Higher appointment availability with shorter waiting times.
- More budget-friendly pricing due to high patient volume.
What its reviews flag
- Misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment reported by patients.
- Poor communication and long waiting times.
- Patients feel misled about treatment plans.
Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.
Read the full Taki Dent vs Akdeniz comparison →Show the score calculation (5.1 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 7.9 ×20% 1.58 10 − 6×0.35 for 6 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.1 - 15
Antlara
5.1 / 10 7 sourced 1–2★Where it may suit you
- More appointment availability with shorter wait times.
- Broader range of on-site dental specialities.
What its reviews flag
- Patients report severe clinical failures like cracked bridges and missing bone grafts.
- Aggressive billing practices, including demands for payment before treatment completion.
- No refunds or remedial work offered after complications arise.
Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.
Read the full Taki Dent vs Antlara comparison →Show the score calculation (5.1 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 7.550000000000001 ×20% 1.51 10 − 7×0.35 for 7 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.1 - 16
Dent Laracity
5.1 / 10 6 sourced 1–2★Where it may suit you
- Likely more appointment slots and shorter waiting times for treatment.
- May offer more competitive package pricing due to high patient volume.
What its reviews flag
- Incompetent handling of crowns and implants causing pain and delays.
- Appointments repeatedly postponed; staff dismissive and unprofessional.
- Described by patients as genuinely dangerous to dental health.
Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.
Show the score calculation (5.1 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 7.9 ×20% 1.58 10 − 6×0.35 for 6 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.1 - 17
Papatya
5.1 / 10 7 sourced 1–2★Where it may suit you
- More flexible appointment availability for urgent cases
- Wider range of dental specialities under one roof
What its reviews flag
- Unnecessary and aggressive extractions reported.
- Patients left with infections and no teeth after treatment.
- Unhygienic environment with staff smoking and serving beer.
Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.
Show the score calculation (5.1 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 7.550000000000001 ×20% 1.51 10 − 7×0.35 for 7 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 5.1 - 18
Antalya Smile Designs
4.9 / 10 9 sourced 1–2★Where it may suit you
- More appointment slots available, reducing wait times.
- Potentially lower headline prices for budget-conscious patients.
What its reviews flag
- Goes silent and fails to respond after issues arise.
- Refuses refunds and won't sort complaints.
- Treatment delays force patients to pay extra costs.
Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.
Read the full Taki Dent vs Antalya Smile Designs comparison →Show the score calculation (4.9 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 6.85 ×20% 1.37 10 − 9×0.35 for 9 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 4.9 - 19
Lara Smile
4.9 / 10 10 sourced 1–2★Where it may suit you
- More appointment availability due to larger capacity.
- Often offers lower headline prices for basic procedures.
What its reviews flag
- Extremely rushed procedures, e.g., 8-minute cleaning.
- Failed restorative work leaving patients without teeth.
- Poor pricing communication via phone inquiries.
Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.
Read the full Taki Dent vs Lara Smile comparison →Show the score calculation (4.9 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 6.5 ×20% 1.3 10 − 10×0.35 for 10 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 4.9 - 20
Magic Smile
4.9 / 10 9 sourced 1–2★Where it may suit you
- Higher appointment availability with shorter waiting times.
- Broader range of on-site specialists for comprehensive care.
What its reviews flag
- Rushed work: impressions taken while swollen, causing ill-fitting crowns.
- Catastrophic failures: multiple sets of bridges misaligned and broken.
- Poor aftercare: no guarantee, patients warned to avoid.
Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.
Show the score calculation (4.9 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 6.85 ×20% 1.37 10 − 9×0.35 for 9 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 4.9 - 21
Ballipinar
4.8 / 10Where it may suit you
- Higher appointment availability and shorter wait times.
- Broader range of on-site specialities under one roof.
What its reviews flag
- No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
- No single named treating specialist advertised.
- Guarantee terms not published online.
Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.
Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 6 ×20% 1.2 no published review record → neutral 6 Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 4.8 - 22
Dental Centre Turkey
4.8 / 10Where it may suit you
- Larger clinic can often offer more flexible appointment scheduling.
- May provide more budget-friendly pricing due to higher patient volume.
What its reviews flag
- No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate.
- No single named treating specialist advertised.
- Guarantee terms not published online.
Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.
Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 6 ×20% 1.2 no published review record → neutral 6 Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 4.8 - 23
Secil Dental
4.8 / 10Where it may suit you
- More appointment availability with shorter waiting times.
- Broader range of dental specialities under one roof.
What its reviews flag
- No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
- No single named treating specialist advertised.
- Guarantee terms not published; no verified UK-patient review record.
Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.
Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 6 ×20% 1.2 no published review record → neutral 6 Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 4.8 - 24
Smile
4.8 / 10Where it may suit you
- Broader range of on-site specialists for complex cases.
- Higher appointment availability with shorter waiting times.
What its reviews flag
- No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
- No single named treating specialist advertised.
- Guarantee terms not published; no verified UK-patient review record.
Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.
Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 6 ×20% 1.2 no published review record → neutral 6 Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 4.8 - 25
Smile Center Turkey
4.8 / 10Where it may suit you
- More appointment availability due to larger capacity with multiple chairs.
- Often offers competitive package pricing for comprehensive dental tourism.
What its reviews flag
- No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
- No single named treating specialist advertised.
- Guarantee terms not published and no verified UK-patient review record.
Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.
Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 6 ×20% 1.2 no published review record → neutral 6 Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 4.8 - 26
Smile Dental Turkey
4.8 / 10Where it may suit you
- Larger capacity means more appointment availability and shorter waits.
- Often offers more competitive headline pricing for budget-conscious patients.
What its reviews flag
- No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
- No single named treating specialist advertised.
- Guarantee terms and UK-patient review record not published.
Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.
Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 6 ×20% 1.2 no published review record → neutral 6 Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 4.8 - 27
Yalin Dental
4.8 / 10Where it may suit you
- More flexible appointment scheduling due to larger capacity.
- Often offers lower headline prices through high patient volume.
What its reviews flag
- No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
- No single named treating specialist advertised.
- Guarantee terms and verified UK-patient review record absent.
Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.
Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 6 ×20% 1.2 no published review record → neutral 6 Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 4.8 - 28
Attelia
3.8 / 10 Fake reviews removed by platformWhere it may suit you
- Larger team means more appointment availability and shorter waits.
- Offers a wide range of dental specialties under one roof.
What its reviews flag
- Prices often change on arrival from agreed quote.
- Patients report poor communication and wrong treatment areas.
- Lack of care and respect during procedures, e.g., drilling while head sore.
Suitable for: strictly budget-led patients who read every review critically. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is a clean, trustworthy review record.
Read the full Taki Dent vs Attelia comparison →Show the score calculation (3.8 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 1 ×20% 0.2 16 sourced 1–2★ + heavy penalty for removed fake reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 3.8 - 29
Dentakay
3.8 / 10 27 sourced 1–2★Where it may suit you
- Higher appointment availability for urgent dental needs
- Broader range of specialists available on-site for complex cases
What its reviews flag
- Multiple reviews report clinic ignores patients post-treatment.
- One patient says wrong colour crowns fitted, then ignored.
- Another review suggests poor communication after issues arise.
Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.
Read the full Taki Dent vs Dentakay comparison →Show the score calculation (3.8 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 1 ×20% 0.2 10 − 27×0.35 for 27 verified 1–2★ reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 3.8 - 30
Dental Design Turkey
3.8 / 10 Fake reviews removed by platformWhere it may suit you
- Likely offers more flexible appointment slots for urgent cases.
- May provide more competitive pricing due to higher patient volume.
What its reviews flag
- No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
- No single named treating specialist advertised.
- Guarantee terms not published and no verified UK-patient review record.
Suitable for: strictly budget-led patients who read every review critically. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is a clean, trustworthy review record.
Read the full Taki Dent vs Dental Design Turkey comparison →Show the score calculation (3.8 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 1 ×20% 0.2 0 sourced 1–2★ + heavy penalty for removed fake reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 3.8 - 31
Perla
3.8 / 10 Fake reviews removed by platformWhere it may suit you
- More likely to accommodate urgent appointments at short notice.
- Often offers competitive package pricing for multiple treatments.
What its reviews flag
- Reviews report severe dental damage requiring extensive corrective work.
- Patients unable to chew years after treatment, indicating long-term harm.
- Aftercare and guarantee repair process criticised as ineffective.
Suitable for: strictly budget-led patients who read every review critically. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is a clean, trustworthy review record.
Show the score calculation (3.8 / 10)
Criterion Score × Weight = Contribution Why this score Accreditation 3 ×20% 0.6 no published certificate number Who treats you 5 ×20% 1 rotating team / treating dentist not named Review record 1 ×20% 0.2 8 sourced 1–2★ + heavy penalty for removed fake reviews Guarantee 4 ×15% 0.6 guarantee terms not published Implants 5 ×15% 0.75 brands / passports not evidenced Communication 6 ×10% 0.6 not documented as standard Overall (sum of contributions) 3.8
Method: each clinic is scored 0–10 per criterion on a fixed rubric and combined using the published weights; every card shows its own calculation. Cons for clinics with a review record are drawn from their real 1–2★ reviews; where a clinic has removed reviews flagged as fake, its visible complaint count understates the history. For clinics with no published review record we score conservatively and say so, never inventing a rating. Prices, waiting times and individual outcomes vary by case and by the treating dentist. Full method, rubric and dataset: editorial policy · CSV.